(NAT) New Podcast
0 2 Votes
Rate it:
By IslandBound
- (NAT) New Podcast
- Created: Apr 26, 2008
- Last updated: Aug 14, 2008
- After episode: 4.9: The Shape of Things to Come
- Status: Current
- Flag this theory:
Enjoy!
http://abc.go.com/primetime/lost/index?pn=podcast#t=3421
dude… tnx 4 telling me =D
ah there you are Island_bound!
it’s just your theories are so far and few between it’s nigh on impossible to find you.
this latest abomination from you is at least presented as NAT & also you have given appropriate credit to the real author, but let us get one thing straight…..the OJ references are not new, the idea that OJ had something to do with travel to the island was posited long long before you rehashed it here.
To ‘claim’ as you do to have solved a mystery of LOST caused me so much mirth I actually toasted you, for giving me the best laugh i have had in ages. Talk about the Ho-Ho’s!
O-L-D-H-A-T
r-e-h-a-s-h-e-d
B-O-R-I-N-G
Why don’t you post somethng that is….New
something that is….unique
something that you……didn’t get from somewhere else
something which ……would require you actually using your brain
Island_bound, cmon man it’s all looking rather flimsy on the theory front, don’t you have any ideas of your own? I am more than willing to give you my opinion of them. I’m waiting.
You are right. I should really bunker down and come up with a blockbuster… like one of your amazing theories.
I enjoy reading great theories, by the awesome people on this site, replying here and there, and posting from time to time.
I never said it was new. I never said I wrote it. I gave the proper credit to the writer, and provided a link.
You are not to bright. “At least when you post under the JORGE name.”
i would like to read your bunker blockbuster i really would but i am unoptimistic that you will ever come up with a proper theory, so why don’t you prove me wrong? and hey island_bound, i AM one of those awesome people on this site, and you have commented upon my posts, but as you say, not under the pseudonym Jorge, and let me tell you, you LIKE my stuff and I have your comments to remind me! thanks!! (can’t say I feel the same about your stuff though!)
No one said you said it was new.
No one said you wrote it.
No one said you did not give the credit, in fact i clearly stated that at least you HAD given credit. (perhaps this is why your stuff sucks, because you can’t keep a cognitive argument for long and begin inventing stuff as above!)
and if you are going to comment that ‘you are not to bright’, you should at least have the temerity to sepll it right!! it is ‘TOO’. but hey I don’t mind correcting you on your r-e-t-a-r-d-e-d-grammar!
So you are a smart person who acts retarded? It is so cowardly to hide behind fake names.
Good posts= good replies. Dumb posts= negative replies.
I assumed you had other names, and probably some good theories. But then you act like a pussy with fake names. NO SENSE.
And yes, I spelled “to” wrong. You are the master.
I am not a smart person, never claimed to be, but I AM awesome as YOU described me, because whether you like it or not, you WERE including me in your list of people you LIKE!
so it is cowardly to hide behind false names is it?
well that is interesting….stephen king (is that relative to Lost enough for you?) also writes as stephen bachman…….
Lewis Carroll (alice in wonderland…is that Lost relative enough for you)was really Charles Dodgston…….
have you complained about that to them? of course you haven’t.
and how is my behaviour related to feline behaviour? or were you referring to the phrase ‘pussy’ in your guttersnipe slang as a euphamism and where you intended it as a type of insult.
Sticks and stones! if thats the most insulting you can get, you need lessons. I could give you some.
but thanks for regarding me with the appropriate title of ‘MASTER’, again YOUR words and for a change on that point I am in total agreement with you.
It would be unfortunate for you to have the title of master because your surname is no doubt BATER. Is your occupation a Banker?
and hey! island_bound! stop trying to distract me away from the fact that whilst all this frivolous banter is amusing to me, my real concern is with the quality of your theories (or lack of should I say), I will give you this, you are a champion at digressing away from that point on every single post with me!
stop that at once and face up to the truth about your (lack of) posts. The first step to healing thyself is introspection, so get in front of that mirror!
you won’t like what you see, but it will be your first step back into the real world.
Please! Stephen Bachman admits he is Stephen king. He doesn’t hide like a coward. You do. Stephen King also isn’t bashing people on the net under a fake name.
If you were to admit your other identities, people would lose respect for you. Why? Because under the Jorge name, you act like an idiot.
yeah and I have admitted i am not Jorge! same difference!
‘bashing people’ !!! thats harsh man! all i do is engage you with some wordplay to get you going and you fall for it every single time!
and lets define who the real idiot is here….
you STATE i act like an idiot, right?
so you know i am an idiot right?
so what sort of bigger IDIOT actually engages and replies to someone they consider an idiot?
YOU thats who!
take a whole day to consider that and realise the paradoxical nature of your statement and your replies!
here is an anagram for you which spells out you…..(clue:2word phrase) I’d read detroit
ok I don’t want to have to wait 20 years for someone of your low-grade intelligence to work it out, so here is the answer….
r-e-t-a-r-d-e-d i-d-i-o-t
Look at fake tubbie go or should I call you mean little doggie. Gotcha you again. Booya! Mean old dog is moving in.
Anybody notice fake tubbie aka little doggie took on the name OJay to mock Island Bounds theory about orange juice? Booya! Get used to the the junk yard dog dogging you. arrrugh
the typing is all messed up on this post….