Dr. Manhattan or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying About Time Travel and Love Course Correction
+12 24 Votes
Rate it:
By Billy_G_Oat
- Dr. Manhattan or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying About Time Travel and Love Course Correction
- Created: Apr 3, 2008
- Last updated: Aug 14, 2008
- After episode: 4.5: The Constant
- Status: Current
- Flag this theory:
A simplified examination of time travel, paradoxes, course correction and other phenomenon in the LOST universe
— Billy_G_Oat
Some edits intended to better explain a point or offer more conclusive proof of a theory. Thursday, April 03 at 2:20 pm.
Edited credits from end to beginning. Corrected spelling of Novikov from Noviki. Added new wiki source and improved grammar under Novikov section. Thursday, April 03, 4:20 pm.
Edited to add Preface on April 05, 2008, 4:00 pm
Preface
It’s clear from the comments by ravenontheleft here:
http://www.lost-theories.com/theories/2008/apr/05/rumor-mill-and-why-time-travel/
regarding my post here:
http://lost-theories.com/theories/2008/apr/03/dr-manhattan-or-how-i-learned-/
that I was far too general when I discussed some, if not all, of my points, despite the growing size of the presentation. It is not my intention to ruin anyone’s day or sway the masses toward or against a particular theory. This is simply how I “perceive” some of the events of LOST to date.
I didn’t want to start a whole new post in reply to ravenontheleft’s rebuttal simply for me revisit the same subjects and themes in my previous post. So I’m just adding this preface to the beginning. I’ve kept it as short as possible so that those who’ve already read the previous information can quickly catch up on the addition.
I encourage all readers to visit the other theories and form their own opinions.
Original Theory - Dr. Manhattan and The Watchmen
My suggestion (it’s certainly not my theory) is that Desmond is not time traveling in the traditional sense of the word and is able to see time as the past, present and future simultaneously, as shown by the character Dr. Manhattan in The Watchmen comic. He either always had this ability to some degree or inadvertantly received this ability when he turned the failsafe key. I propose that Desmond’s life is predetermined, in tragic and poetic way, like that of James Cole in 12 Monkeys, so that he is both the a cause and a solution to the events Mrs. Hawking suggests alter and destroy the universe as we know it.
I mean to suggest that Desmond’s ability to “experience” time simultaneously and non-linearly does not allow him to change events because his struggle is a literary one, not one of free will, but of destiny. I believe that the producers still refer to this as time travel because there is no better term for his unique flashback/flashforward experiences.
The one major paradox, as ravenontheleft pointed out, seems to be the appearance of the quote “If anything goes wrong, Desmond Hume will be my constant.” in Daniel’s notebook. He seems surprised and/or relieved that he’s found this in his notebook. However, that doesn’t mean that the quote didn’t exist in his book prior to his discovering it. It’s just as plausible that he didn’t remember writing it, just as he didn’t remember meeting Desmond.
This implies that Desmond is affecting time, to which I argue semantics. I’m suggesting that these events were always meant to occur and Desmond has changed nothing because he always did the things he did. Why would he not know who Daniel was in the present? I don’t know. I’m sure his sense of time and memories is very confusing to him and Daniel did have a considerably different appearance in 1996 compared to that of the present.
Why I Stopped Worrying About Time Travel and Learned to Love Course Correction
Subtle, and not so subtle, hints have been inferred from the use of names and formulas associated with scientists involved in the study of theoretic physics, such as Faraday, Kerr, Minkowski and others. However, there are just as many implications to the opposite and spiritual/philosphical explanation as shown by the use of character names and books, such as Locke, Rosseau and Hume. Not to mention the biblical/theology references that are equally mentioned on the show, such as names like Ben, Jacob, Christian and Shephard which suggest some greater power at work.
The title of the original article was intended to point out how I don’t think time travel is something to worry about, whether it appears in LOST or not. More important than the time travel element is the actual “course correction” element, which implies some sort of predestination for our islanders, and particularly for Desmond. I have faith that the writers, should a more traditional form of time travel appear in the show, use it to further the drama, suspense and mystery we’ve all come to love.
It is on a strictly emotional level that I oppose any form of physical time travel that might alter the course of events we’ve come to accept in almost 4 seasons. In fact, it would be a tremendous disappointment to me to know that I watched 6 seasons of a show that really didn’t happen the way I viewed them because some event in history was changed.
The Orchid “Orientation” Film
The one blatant exception to some form of “physical time travel” has been the Orchid Orientation Film. In the Orchid Orientation film, the Casimir Effect is mentioned, further fueling time travel theories via the use of wormholes, which are theoretically possible and even plausible in the show considering the “unique” electromagnetic properties of the island. To oversimplify things, wormholes can be visualized as tunnel between two universes or even between two times in the same universe. This suggests that the duplicate rabbit shown in the Orchid Film was somehow transported as a past, future or alternate timeline version of the same rabbit already present in our universe. The “complete” video can be found here:
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Orchid
Unfortunately, the Orchid film has never been shown, in part or in whole, on the television show LOST. There has also been no mention of an actual Orchid Station in the show. It has been stated by producers that the film was “spliced” together from pieces found in Norway which is obviously a fictional account of non-existant events and may imply it’s presentation is incomplete.
I cannot refute the events of the Orchid Film, however I do not believe we are to take them as literal events that occured. Equally believable is that it appears to be more of a parody of an actual orientation film presented to fans of the show at ComicCon and is not to be considered canon. While the film may hold some truth as to what the Dharma Initiative was up to, it may simply be a ruse, as it has not appeared on network television or on ABC’s website. It was only distributed via youtube and other viral sites.
However, it’s just as plausible that the Orchid Film, should it be considered canon, was staged by Dharma to frighten the occupants of the Orchid Station into performing some sort of task. Equally plausible, and supportive of wormhole theorists, is that Dharma was able to create a wormhole, based on the Casimir Effect, to transport chosen people to and from the island, not through time, per say, but most definitely through space. This would explain the Polar bear in Africa, the airplane from Nigeria and other seemingly impossible events.
Preface Summary
I am not opposed to theories of astral projection, teleportation or paranormal activity that explain long distant, instantaneous physical travel from one location to another. Some of these theories also explain the whispers, smoke monster and other mysteries. And while science does not necessarly make a distinction between space and time, suggesting they are irrevocably linked together by their nature, I do make that distinction. I distinguish the travel across space and the travel through time as two differnt things, even if they are based on the same principles. But, of course, I’m no scientist, nor do I claim to have an even minimal understanding of the theories of Einstein, Ker, Hawking or others.
I hope this helps better organize my thoughts and continue to promote the ideas of wormholes, vile vorteces or time travel that isn’t counterproductive to the story so far.
Here is some additional reading that may be relavent:
Vile Vortices - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vile_Vortices
Time travel for beginners - http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/John_Gribbin/timetrav.htm
Thanks to ravenontheleft for his intelligent debate and criticism:
http://www.lost-theories.com/theories/2008/apr/05/rumor-mill-and-why-time-travel/
Thanks segwaypirate for his highly rated thoughts on Noviki’s theory:
http://lost-theories.com/theories/2008/apr/01/novikov-self-consistency-princ/
And
Veefre - I’m not being sarcastic here even though I have been in the past, thanks for being skeptical of attempts to explain fantasy with science. I don’t believe we will ever have conclusive answers to all the mysteries of LOST, but I hope the science-inspired plot devices are still plausible in the writers’ fantasy world. Regardless, it’s fun to think about and postulate ideas that might explain some or all of the mysteries.
Continue reading if you want, but it’s unecessary at this point. Only time will tell what the writers of LOST are up to and my attempts to explain events before they are revealed is an act of futility.
original post
Here is the original post with some minor edits that occured prior to writing the “Preface” section.
Credits
None of these ideas are particularly mine. While I was writing this document over the course of a couple of days, someone else brought up Novikov’s theory here and I wanted to make sure it was properly credited as well as some other posts that I unintentionally “borrowed”:
http://lost-theories.com/theories/2008/apr/01/novikov-self-consistency-princ/
http://www.lost-theories.com/theories/2007/oct/21/time-travelparadox-not-really-/
http://lost-theories.com/theories/2008/mar/26/when-des-met-jack/
Introduction
First off, let me apologize for the extraordinary length of this post. And let me say that little of what I write here comes from my mind. It’s a compilation of information and facts, discovered and theorized by others, and presented in what I hope is a coherent and organized fashion so that I may make a point. Most of the information is taken from:
http://www.lostpedia.com - Unofficial LOST encyclopedia
http://dynamic.abc.go.com/streaming/landing - the actual episodes
http://wikipedia.org/ - non-fiction source
Second off, this is not a theory, per say. In a way, it’s an effort to debunk other theories and inspire more creative theories which don’t rely so heavily on science-fiction because
A) I think that LOST as a show must appeal to a mass audience and its explanations cannot be overly complicated or scientific or they’ll run the risk of disappointing millions of viewers week to week.
And
B) I don’t presume to be intelligent enough to understand the theories of Einstein, Minkowski, Hawking or even Faraday anymore than the average television viewer.
If further clarification of anything I regard as common knowledge is required, or you simply don’t believe me, I’ll be happy to try to find the source. Lastly, there are several spoilers in this writing that reveal key plot points of several non-LOST films. If you should not like to know this information, I suggest you stop reading.
And so I begin…
Time Travel in LOST and the problem of paradoxes
Many fans of LOST like to speculate about time travel. Many fans of LOST are also fans of Back to the Future, The Terminator, Donnie Darko and other films involving time travel. But the numbers of theories out there that use time travel to explain the mysteries of the LOST is shocking. They all seem to be forgetting one thing… There is no conventional time travel in the LOST universe.
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Debunkedtheories*TimeTravel
Theory: One or more of the characters traveled in a time machine or went through something that involved time travel (as conventionally related in the science fiction genre).
“There isn’t any time travel.” However, the events of “Flashes Before Your Eyes” appear to contradict that
Though the writers have said “no time travel” specifically, Damon Lindelof also drops the hint that time may move differently on the island.
So, let’s be specific. There is no physical time travel on LOST. This would be the act of a person and their body leaving one time and visiting another time, usually via a technology. This presents one enormous problem that would become an obstacle or, even worse, a crutch, for the writers - the paradox. One example is the grandfather paradox which states that if a time traveler went back in time and killed his grandfather before his father was born, then he would never be born and could not have traveled back in time to kill his grandfather.
To be less specific this implies that a time traveler cannot change the past without changing both the present and the future and the changes he makes may put his future self and events at risk. This also leads to more detailed paradoxes, such as the Butterfly Effect, as shown in the movie The Butterfly Effect and the Sound of Thunder where even the slightest, smallest change in the past can result in ripple of cause and effect events which would create catastrophic and enormous changes in the present and future.
Alternate Dimensions and Parallel Universes
One easy way out of this conundrum is to create an alternate dimension or parallel universe. In Back to the Future, we’re told, in no simple terms, that Marty McFly has endangered his future self by affecting events which lead to his parents’ marriage and his conception. But Marty McFly’s existence would therefore be immediately and irreparably destroyed. Instead, he course corrects the timeline and encourage a relationship between his parents. However, when he returns to the present, he finds that everything has changed slightly. This results in a story which relies on both a parallel universe AND the Butterfly Effect. It introduces a paradox, but then allows the paradox to continue by implying (through Doc Brown’s chart) that the universe is a different universe than the one Marty McFly left. Furthermore, even if Marty was able to correct the events he had changed, he would not be able to return to his own universe, but would return to the present of his recently created parallel universe. I know, it’s all a bit confusing considering how fun and entertaining the trilogy was. Fortunately, none of it matters:
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/OfficialLostAudioPodcasttranscript/February28%2C2008
Damon Lindelof: Just a quick sort of side note in terms of the way that we deal with time travel on the show - we are very paradox averse; that is to say, when our characters are time traveling, nothing that they do can change the present or the future that you have seen. Which is different than you know, the conventional Back to the Future time travel story telling.
Carlton Cuse: The hard thing about this episode was actually structuring the time travel elements - or consciousness traveling elements - and avoiding paradox. But that again is something that I think a lot of people have speculated about - “are there parallel futures, are there sort of multiple universes and worlds that exist in the future depending on how events in the past play out?” and that is not our intention.
DL: Yeah, and Ms. Hawking basically explained those rules in the first episode, “Flashes Before Your Eyes” where she basically said that the universe has a way of course correcting, so even if you did something in the past that you didn’t do before, somehow the sort of fabric of time like swoops in around you and fixes everything so things don’t go off the rails.
Fans have tried to avoid the time travel paradox with theories of wormholes, gravitational event horizons and other science inspired explanations. So… if we are to take the producers and writers at their word (and why shouldn’t we, they haven’t lied to us yet), then we MUST rule out physical time travel, parallel universes, alternate timelines and any other form of time travel that may create a major paradox.
Novikov’s Self Consistency Principle
Before I define the principle, let me illustrate with two examples. There is one fictional world that has handled time travel in an interesting but flawed way. In the Terminator franchise paradoxes occur, but have no effect on the overall timeline of the events in the present or future. Two major paradoxes, among some minor others, occur in the first two films. The first is that John Connor sends a man back to the present that impregnates Sarah Connor. Her child turns out to be the John Connor. Obviously, the events of the present rely on the events of the future to occur, but the events of the future cannot occur if the events of the present to not exist. The paradox. The second is that the terminator is sent back in time by Skynet to kill John Connor, but after his defeat his arm is later found by a scientist who goes on to create the Skynet that sends the terminator back in time creating a dependent loop which is impossible in a single timeline.
As the Terminator franchise evolved into Terminator 3, we learned that despite John Connor’s efforts as a young man, the apocalypse still occurs. The Terminator television show expands on the events between Terminator 2 and Terminator 3 with further attempts to change the future. However, unless the franchise chooses to ignore Terminator 3, the results will be the same. Skynet will destroy civilization and rule the world with artificially intelligent robot technology. Bummer.
Still, there is one particular movie that employs Novikov’s theory in a reasonable and poetic way - 12 Monkeys. James Cole is sent back in time to find out the source of a virus which eventually destroys civilization as we know it. However, he is sent back to the incorrect year. Cole arrives in the past naked and confused. Throughout the movie he is haunted by memories from his childhood in which he witnesses a man being shot at the airport. Each time he remembers this, the events of the memory change slightly, as if he is still piecing it together in his mind or something he changes alters his memory. When he is returned to the present, it seems that none of the things he did in the past changed the reality of the present and he informs the scientists that he was sent to the wrong time.
He’s sent back again, this time to the correct time – a few days before the virus is discovered - and eventually he comes to find out that the people suspected of creating the virus were inspired to reek havoc by his first visit into the past. By the end of the film he not only finds out that the people suspected of creating the virus had little to do with it, but he also inadvertently helps find the real source of the virus so it can be reverse engineered in the present. And in a tragic series of events, unstoppable by Cole, he finds out that the man he witnessed being shot as a child was his present self in the past, revealing that his memories were accurate all along. None of the things he changed affected the present, but in fact were always meant to play out that way.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_travel
12 Moneys is a loose example of “Novikov’s self-consistency principle” as described in wikipedia’s article on time travel. Persons “traveling through a wormhole”, like the one created by the scientists in 12 Monkeys, “could never engender paradoxes” because “there are no initial conditions that lead to paradox once time travel is introduced.” This suggests that a time traveler could never endanger events in the past which might prevent his traveling back from the future. Another use of this principle states that “if his results can be generalised, they would suggest, curiously, that none of the supposed paradoxes formulated in time travel stories can actually be formulated at a precise physical level: that is, that any situation you can set up in a time travel story turns out to permit many consistent solutions. The circumstances might, however, turn out to be almost unbelievably strange.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novikovself-consistencyprinciple
Basically, and I’m simplifying things dramatically, this theory allows for the ignoring the Butterfly Effect and assuming that major events in a timeline will occur regardless of how many minor events in that timeline are changed. This theory also allows that space/time is flexible and able to tolerate infinite minor changes so long as major events still take place. Still, Novikov’s theory doesn’t actually disprove the paradox exists. It does, however, attempt to justify them by implying that whatever happens will always happen. It truly is a synergetic theory which combines free will and destiny.
Free Will vs. Destiny
A common theme in LOST has been that of free will vs. destiny. John Locke seems to believe that the island, on some level, has chosen everyone for a reason while Jack Shephard has insisted that free will governs all. These two characters have been at odds since the debut of the show. We’ve come to accept that because there are so many connections between the survivors of flight 815 that there must be a greater force at work – one which decides the fate of our survivors. But Six Degrees of Separation clearly shows that none of us, including our beloved survivors, are all that far apart from one another on a world wide scale. Only 71 of 324 passengers, excluding Vincent the dog, survived the crash. Of those, only a couple of dozen are featured in important roles with concise back stories. And even those people did not know each other personally. They are connected via coincidences which are not all that unreasonable because of the events that led them to Australia and eventually onto flight 815.
That’s not to say these coincidences don’t have some deeper meaning in the mythology of LOST. It only implies that “coincidence should not be mistaken for fate.” On the other hand, it does appear that at least some of the connections between characters have been manipulated by outside forces. Desmond, however, seems to walk a line. He seems to be the center of the story in terms of our survivors. Sure, the island has been around for ages. Sure, the Hanso and Dharma had been using the island for experiments. Sure, Ben and the Others have some connection to the island which existed long before Desmond’s arrival. But it is Desmond’s role in LOST which represents a battle with the cosmos. He is not battling another person over a belief system… he is at war with the universe.
What may be inferred by Desmond’s story, as opposed to John’s and Jack’s stories, is that there doesn’t have to be a difference between free will and destiny. This is a common debate by theologians. God gave man free will, yet he has a plan for the universe. Everyday people claim that if something is God’s will it will happen – “The Lord works in mysterious ways” - implying that He has some playbook that determines what we do. So is it man’s will or God’s will that governs our decision making process? A more plausible answer is that it’s both. The choices you make day to day are irrelevant compared to the events that govern the space/time continuum. One does not have to be independent of the other.
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Official_LostPodcasttranscript/February20%2C2007
DL: Uh, for the first time in the history of the show we actually allowed a character to have an opportunity to make a different choice than they make before and, uh, Desmond doesn’t. He is, he’s, he, he is, he is course corrected by, by a certain mysterious, uh, older lady in a ring shop.
CC: Yes, exactly. More on destiny later in the series.
DL: Exactly. It is our destiny to talk more about destiny.
CC: Yes, because that’s a factor
Linear Time
The events of LOST are linear from point A to point Z. Events that occur in flash backs or flash forwards are still linear; they are just presented to the viewer in a non-linear fashion. In other words, just because we see event T come before event M, doesn’t mean those events actually occurred in that order. It simply means that for the purposes of drama, story telling and plot secrecy, that the events are intentionally revealed out of order. But while the events on the island are also linear, that is to say they occur from point A to point Z; they also seem to occur at a different pace, either slower or faster, than that of the outside world.
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Debunkedtheories*TimeTravel
“Damon Lindelof also drops the hint that time may move differently on the island; for example, at Comic Con ‘06, where he responded to one fan’s question with: “It’s interesting that you should ask about time because… you know… you’re making a basic assumption that they’ve been there, y’know, as long as they think they’ve been there.”
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/The_Constant
“According to the calendar on the wall, as well as Desmond, the real-time events of this episode take place on Day 94 (Christmas Eve) when Sayid, Desmond and Frank left the Island. This seems to mean that while it is Day 94 on the freighter, it is actually Day 96 on the Island.”
But let’s backtrack…
There is no time travel in LOST.
This means many theories about LOST involving physical time travel can immediately be refuted by the producer’s / writer’s statements. Things like “Jack and Kate went back in time and started Dharma”, or “Jack and Juliet will travel through time and stop purge so Dharma can continue.” So far nothing in the show has proven that anyone is time traveling. The very term is being misused. Desmond is doing something much different.
Inherent Omnipresent Awareness of the Space/Time Continuum, or: The Watchmen
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Watchmen
Damon Lindelof called Watchmen “the greatest piece of popular fiction ever produced”. Source: Entertainment Weekly
Also, writer Brian K. Vaughan, who is best known for his works in the field of comics, cited Watchmen as “definitely” the inspiration for his start as a writer.
There are many locations and events in the story that bear similarity to locations and events on the island, just as many other literary tales have crept into the show or inspired its mythology. To be specific, though, one of the main characters in The Watchmen is Dr. Manhattan. Due to a tragic accident, a character named Jon becomes a god-like figure with superhuman powers, including the ability to experience time – past, present and future - simultaneously. He later goes by the name Dr. Manhattan, presumably named after the Manhattan Project. Despite this ability to see all time simultaneously, he still exists in the present and is unable, or possibly unwilling, to change the past in order to effect the present or future. This relates directly to Desmond. Only his mind is traveling into the past/future, retaining the knowledge he has of the present.
Changing the Past
Now, the events of “Flashes Before Your Eyes” at the time they aired suggested that Desmond’s recollection of the past was an alternate timeline. In other words, Desmond was remembering his past differently than it actually occurred and was able to distinguish those differences because he retained some knowledge of his original timeline.
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Official_LostPodcasttranscript/February20%2C2007
”Damon Lindelof: Absolutely, but I think what’s interesting is there are, there are certain things that happen the way that they used to happen, that he changed as a result of being in the past, that might sort of resonate over time, you know. Like getting hit in the face, instead of the bartender, or the fact that the photograph of he and Penny got take uh - got, got taken the day that he broke up with her. Maybe, maybe in a, in another incarnation there were two photographs, you know. Maybe they, maybe they’ve, maybe there was a two for.”
But again, the producers / writers have suggested that there is only one timeline in the show. Desmond is simply observing “Novikov’s self-consistency principle” and anything he did to lead to the events as we know them in the present will still occur in his past even if he attempts to change them – a.k.a. course correction.
Changing the Future
The events that occur between “Flashes Before Your Eyes” and “The Constant” all have to do with Desmond’s ability to see future events and his inability to prevent, or encourage, their long term outcome. Five specific premonitions occur, although more may have been unseen by the audience. The first was his prediction of John’s speech about rescuing Jack, Kate and Sawyer. The second predicted Charlie dying in a lighting strike. The third predicted Charlie drowning while trying to rescue Claire. The fourth predicted Charlie drowning while trying to capture a pigeon for Claire. And the fifth was seeing Charlie drown in the Looking Glass Station.
That has encouraged people to think that he, or other characters, could somehow effect the present and/or future by changing the past and inspired all sorts of speculative time travel based theories. But this is where the paradox comes into play. Should he, for example, decide to go ahead with is marriage to Penny (I think we can all agree that that would be a major change in the LOST timeline since Mrs. Hawking shows up at this time), he would never go to the island, he would never cause flight 815’s crash, and the events of the LOST as we know it would simply not exist. We would experience lost time because 6 seasons would have a crappy ending. That would suck.
Thankfully, the writers have been faithful to their word though. Nothing Desmond has done in the past has effected the present. Intentionally or unintentionally, the writers have adhered to “Novikov’s self-consistency principle”. That said Desmond can affect the future because the future has not happened yet. The flashes he has of the future are possible outcomes that fan off from a point in the present at which he has his flash. They are not alternate or parallel universes. They are simply pieces of a puzzle that imply one possible outcome of cause and effect. Desmond is able to temporarily change the effect from happening because he prevents the cause. But despite Desmond’s efforts, “Novikov’s self-consistency principle” takes hold and the universe course corrects to make certain that major events will still occur.
Understanding the Present
What was unique about “The Constant” was that instead of revisiting the past with knowledge of the future, Desmond was visiting the present with the limited knowledge of his past self. In other words, in both the present time and flash back scenes, we are witnessing the consciousness of past Desmond. The knowledgeable and wise Desmond of the present seems to have been lost in time. In a sense, the present becomes a flash forward, but only for Desmond.
While it seems that Desmond is doing something different in the past in “The Constant”, none of the changed past events in any episode have affected any past or present events of any other episodes. Several episodes are important to understanding this. A general timeline of Desmond’s life can be seen at
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Desmond
For example, Desmond still leaves Penny. He still joins the military. He still goes to prison. He still gets dishonorably discharged. He still gets out of prison. He still gets Libby’s boat. Desmond still meets Penny and Jack at the stadium. He still goes on the sailing race. He still crashes on the island. He still pushes the button. He still causes the crash of flight 815… and on and on and on.
In fact, the recent “changes” to past events of “The Constant” only further reinforce the past events of previous episodes. The reason he leaves Penny is because Mrs. Hawking explains the consequences if he does not. The reason he goes to prison is likely that he went AWOL after he visited Penny to get a “constant” phone number. The reason he joins the sailing race is because he knows he must get to the island. While the cause of the events may be altered, their effect is the same.
Additional Notes: Free Will vs. Destiny
As it turns out, Charlie was most likely the only survivor who could have entered the code which turns off the jamming device because the code was musical by nature, proving that Desmond could not have taken his place and his attempts to change what was no longer the future but the present, could not be carried out. The universe had spoken and there would be no more delays Charlie’s death was to be so.
But this also raises another question. If the islanders are supposed to leave then Charlie was never really in any danger until the events of the Looking Glass. Therefore Desmond’s rescues were based on flashes that were inaccurate, or possibly misunderstood.
Summary
Let’s review. There is no time travel. There are no alternate or parallel dimensions. There are no alternate timelines. Time on the island is altered from time in the real world, but it is not a separate timeline. The story is linear from beginning to middle to end, but the events that make up that story are told in non-linear fashion. Desmond has gained the ability to “see” the past and future, but his attempts to use this information in the past or present have the same results.
Let’s use an elementary example.
Example 1: Two men in Los Angeles have an appointment to meet in New York. The first man travels by car. The second man travels by train. Both men arrive at the appointment on time.
Example 2: Let’s flash back. The first man who traveled by car, now decides he wants to take a bus. The second man does not change his plans and still takes the train.
Both men arrive at their appointment on time, yet the first man experiences drastically different events during the trip. There are an infinite amount of changes that have occurred, from the people he meets. But had he not ridden the bus, the bus would still have carried all of its other passengers to New York without issue. The major event is completed in both examples, but in different ways.
I hope the above information has convinced someone, somewhere not to post another “So and so is went into the past…” or “So and so will go into the future” theories.
The Rationality Theorem: or Mrs. Hawking the Timelord
edited: This section was intended to mention a suspicion I had had when rewatching the Desmond related scenes. It was not intended to be the focus of this article, but because of it’s length, it may be perceived that way. So, to further explain this theory I have edited this section, and this section only, to better present my ideas as ACTUAL theory.
I am not convinced that Desmond hasn’t always had the ability to see events in a non-linear fashion or that the flashbacks we’ve seen have not included a form of a more present time Desmond that has retained some knowledge of the future and applied it to the major events which determine his path in life. It’s possible that he was already capable of such visions and it’s not until he turns the failsafe key and the hatch implodes that he can process these flashes as visions of a possible future. Previously, he may have shrugged off such visions as déjà vu or daydreams. Or it’s possible that now that he has the ability, he is still learning to control it. In the meantime, he regularly revisits memories with some knowledge of the present.
It is the events of “The Constant” which suggest that Desmond has always had the ability to see outside of the present or has traveled to what we have previously considered simple flashbacks with his present knowledge. As the flashbacks appear in Catch-22 regarding Charlie’s death, are presumably identical in nature to the flashes past Desmond has after returning from the freighter in “The Constant”. To the past Desmond, his trips to the freighter would seem like glimpses of the future presented in pieces, which is how he explains the flashes in “Catch-22”. Additionally, despite his numerous changes to the timeline in both “Flashes Before Your Eyes” and “The Constant”, none of his supposed changes have affected the timeline and events continue to occur as they always have.
Aside from the dialogue and events themselves, there is no concrete evidence of this theory being fact. However, some things can be presumed. Assuming Mrs. Hawking is a human being and not some sort of supernatural apparition, we can presume that she has consciously traveled back in time along side Desmond in “Flashes Before Your Eyes”. In order for her to know that Desmond attempts to marry Penny, she must sense a ripple in the space/time continuum. She seeks to intercept his decision by replacing her past self’s consciousness with her present self’s consciousness and prevent Desmond from further altering the timeline. Or, more accurately, she is aware of the timeline - past, present and future - simultaneously and has always known that Desmond doesn’t marry Penny. You could probably explain it other ways as well. One thing’s for certain, Mrs. Hawking is Obi Wan Kenobi to Desmond’s Luke Skywalker… The Oracle to Neo. She is the wise sage of every mythological story, who explains our heroes powers, abilities and destiny.
Further evidence in “The Constant” explains some other issues. Present Desmond goes to the past where he meets Charlie in the street. But when Present Desmond is restored to his present self and Past Desmond is restored to his past self, there is a problem. Past Desmond would not have experienced meeting Charlie on the street, only Present Desmond would.
What this means is that he could only remember Charlie AFTER he traveled into the past. Curiously, Desmond’s entirely life would be filled with seemingly missing memories of the past which would flood back to his present self in the form of “flashbacks” and his past self would always be haunted by nightmares and daydreams of the future which he might pass off as confusion or deja vu. It’s only when he finds a constant that his consciousness can begin piecing together his dreams, memories and visions as a single simultaneously occuring timeline. Once this happens he will have a greater understanding of his life, purpose and influence on the mythology of LOST. He will become a skilled consciousness traveler like that of Mrs. Hawking.
The Proof Is In The Pudding
edited: This section has been slightly modified and now has a title in an effort to seperate it from the actual theory. The following is a detailed list of Desmond appearances with short notes of relevance regarding his possible out of body/time travel experiences.
Watching the episodes which feature Desmond often reveals a new perspective when you’ve considered this theory. Seemingly irrelevant dialogue takes on new meaning. I encourage everyone to watch the following episodes, either on DVD or on ABC’s home page, with the presumption that Desmond already is, or will eventually become, skilled enough in his “consciousness traveling” to appear in flashbacks as his present self. I’ll be as brief as possible as I point out some of the key moments in episodes:
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Man_ofScience%2CManofFaith
At 30:25 pay attention to Desmond conversation with Jack in the stadium. He has an interesting conversation with Jack in which he states that he was almost a doctor once. He reveals that he’s training for a race around the world and inquires about Jack’s patient Sarah. Jack says he couldn’t fix Sarah, but Desmond asks, “What if you did fix her…” When Jack implies that her circumstances are unusual, Desmond mentions miracles. He calmly gives Jack the advice, “You have to lift it up.” But it sounds like “You have to lift her up.” When Jack questions Desmond’s meaning, Desmond changes to a more joking tone and tells Jack, “You have to lift it up, your leg.” This time he clearly says “it”, not “her”. They part ways and Desmond says, “See you in another life, yeah?”
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Adrift
16:16 – Desmond finds out that flight 815 crashed 44 days earlier and visibly confused by this
25:34 –Jack recognizes Desmond
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Orientation
5:43 – Desmond exclaims that everyone will die, paralleling Mrs. Hawking’s statement that everyone will die if Desmond does not push the button
7:39 – Desmond recognizes Jack
35:04 – Desmond has another conversation with Jack who says, “Why are you running? You don’t even know what you’re running from!” This causes Desmond to recall their meeting in the stadium. Jack is reminded of Sarah informs Desmond that he married Sarah. Desmond acts as though he should have known this, saying “Right… And you’re not married to her anymore then.” Desmond realizes that the miracle he spoke of with Jack came true and calmly says “See you in another life, yeah?” before heading off into the jungle
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Three_Minutes
The survivors mourn the loss of Libby and Ana Lucia when Sun notices Desmond’s boat floating just off the beach camp’s shore.
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Man_ofScience%2CManofFaith
2:01- Desmond recognizes Jack.
3:40 – Desmond compares his existence to that of being inside a snow globe.
5:14 – Desmond explains that he hasn’t read “Our Mutual Friend” yet because he’s saving it as the last book he reads, presuming he knows when he will die, and later has a conversation with Charles Widmore.
13:35 – Desmond and Libby discuss the sailing race.
21:21 – Desmond declares the vaccine is a hoax.
22:06 – Desmond speaks with Penny prior to meeting Jack in the stadium.
Desmond says farewell to John, “See you in another life” and turns the failsafe key.
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Further_Instructions
31:47 – Desmond and Hurley discuss his being naked, the failsafe key, the kidnapping of Jack, Kate and Sawyer, and John’s speech about their rescue… Desmond’s first premonition.
Also, during John’s hallucination in the sweat lodge, John points out Desmond but Boone says, “He’s helping himself.”
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Every_ManforHimself
Desmond prevents Charlie from being struck by lightning
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Flashes_BeforeYourEyes
Desmond prevents Charlie from drowning by rescuing Claire himself. Charlie and Hurley plan to get Desmond drunk in an effort to learn more about his visions.
Desmond has a “consciousness travel” within a flashback. First he flashes back to the events immediately prior to turning the failsafe key. Then, while in his flashback he flashes back further to events with Penny that led him to the island. Desmond in his flashback actually has the consciousness of his present self, but dismisses it as confusion or déjà vu. Many things remind him of his present self, such as the microwave beeping, the delivery man at Widmore’s building saying 815, and the model sail boat in Widmore’s office. He also runs into Charlie. Coincidently, Charlie is singing “Wonderwall” by Oasis, and we specifically hear the words, “And maybe, you’re gonna be the one that saves me. He remembers Charlie from his present but Charlie does not remember Desmond because he has yet to meet him.
He finds his friend Donovan and the two discuss the ideas of time travel. He eventually meets Mrs. Hawking who reveals that he’s not supposed to marry Penny. She knows his name and that he ends up on the island, entering numbers and ultimately turning the failsafe key. She claims that if he doesn’t do these things, everyone will die. This implies that if Desmond doesn’t follow the normal course of events in his life, a catastrophe will occur. When he debates with Mrs. Hawking she explains in greater detail his role in the universe and how his changes will be course corrected, possibly at greater risk then if he’d not changed things. After breaking up with Penny and returning to the bar, he is knocked on the head and returned to the events immediately after the turning of the failsafe key. Shortly thereafter he returns to the present and is still arguing with Charlie. He eventually calms down and tells Charlie of his premonitions and how Charlie is supposed to die.
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Par_Avion
Desmond prevents Charlie’s death while trying to capture a pigeon for Claire.
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Catch-22
Desmond’s premonitions are becoming more clear and accurate, though they are still fragmented because they are a possible outcome and not exactly predetermined. He sees Charlie’s death, Hurley finding the cable to the Looking Glass, and the arrival of an off-islander, whom he believes is Penny. There are lots of little clues about how Desmond’s flashes work, how they are becoming more and more understandable to Desmond, and why Charlie must eventually be allowed to die. He says the flashes change as he attempts to influence the events that occur in them.
During his flashbacks Desmond and Brother Campbell have some interesting conversations. Brother Campbell, who is seen to have a picture of him with Mrs. Hawking, says, “God tests our faith in many ways.” “Personally, Desmond, I never thought you’d last. So now I stand corrected… for whatever reason your path has led you here. Now you’re one of us.” And later when discussing the name of the wine Brother Campbell says, “Perhaps you underestimate the value of sacrifice.”
When he visits Ruth, his former fiancée, he says, “I had a calling… I raised my eyes and I asked, ‘Am I doing the right thing?’” “I knew I was supposed to go with him. I was supposed to leave everything that mattered behind. Sacrifice all of it for a greater calling.”
Later he’s confronted by Brother Campbell who says, “I’m afraid you’re beyond penance, Desmond.” “God has bigger plans for you than being a monk…” When Desmond asks, “What am I supposed to do now?” Brother Campbell responds, “Whatever comes next.”
Desmond prepares to leave the monastery and speaks to Brother Campbell. Desmond doubts that the abbey was just a step on his path and feels unsure about his future. Desmond meets Penny. They flirt and establish the beginnings of what will likely be the most important relationship in the mythology of LOST.
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/D.O.C.
Desmond, Charlie, Hurley and Jin meet Mikhail and work together to save Naomi’s life, who delivers the shocking news that the wreckage of flight 815 was found and there were no survivors.
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Greatest_Hits
Desmond has a premonition of Charlie’s death once again, but with the knowledge that Claire and Aaron will be “rescued” by helicopter. This sets in motion a chain of events that continues into “Through the Looking Glass” and forces, not Desmond, but Charlie to decide what amount of sacrifice is necessary to save his true love.
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Through_theLookingGlass
Desmond makes one last attempt to convince Charlie not to dive to the Looking Glass station, volunteering to take Charlie’s place. But Charlie is destined to die. Under no circumstances can Charlie live. Even as the fateful moment approached, Desmond tried to talk Charlie out of diving to the station because he realized how much Charlie loved Claire. But Charlie has accepted his fate and knocks Desmond unconscious. Desmond also dove down, arguably to avoid Mikhail’s gunfire, to make sure Charlie was okay and try to save him again. This explains how Desmond was able to see details of the Looking Glass station in his premonitions
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/The_Constant
The events of this episode are much different than the events of “Flashes Before Your Eyes.” In that episode, Desmond’s present self revisited his past while his past self seemed in some sort of limbo. But in this episode it is Desmond’s past self which is seen bouncing back and forth between the past and the present. There are lots of other clues in this episode regarding the mythology of LOST, as can be seen in the enhanced version. But I’ll try to focus on Desmond.
The events of the past revolve around his time in basic training at the Royal Regiment in 1996, sometime after he left Penny but before he decided to join the sailing race. He relives his past with minor knowledge of the present which appear as nightmares and daydreams to him. He attempts to call Penny in order to gain some perspective on his situation, but she brushes him off as confused.
In present time Daniel Faraday speaks to the past Desmond via the satellite phone. He asks Desmond to find him in the past so that he can deliver a message regarding Daniels time travel device. When we next see Desmond in the past, he has retained some knowledge of the present, including the freighter and the island. He finds Daniel and delivers the message, but he doesn’t comprehend everything he’s seen in the present, just as he doesn’t comprehend everything he sees in the future. We can presume that while this occurs, the present Desmond is returned to the present or drifts off into unconsciousness.
Desmond mentions that Daniel ends up on an island, which he finds somewhat unbelievable. Daniel questions why he doesn’t remember Desmond in the present. Daniel presumably doesn’t remember Desmond because he’s suffered memory loss from prolonged exposure to the radiation from his own device. He also states that you can’t change the future. This has two meanings. The first of which is simple. You can’t change something that hasn’t happened yet. To Daniel, the future hasn’t occurred, but to Desmond, the future is already happening simultaneously with the past. The second is more complex, but simply relies on the Novikov theory that coincides with fate. Nothing Desmond does will alter the course of events destined to take place.
Eventually he explains the concept of a constant, used in equations as a known value, and says he must find a constant that he’s aware of in both his present and past consciousness. If he can’t do this his bouncing back and forth will continue with exponential frequency until his consciousness simply cannot cope anymore and he will die.
There is still one loose end at this point. Daniel’s rat, Eloise, was yet to be trained to run the maze. Yet when Daniel had supposedly sent her consciousness forward in time, she learned to run the maze because he had intended to teach her in about an hour’s time. It’s possible to explain this. Desmond passed out for roughly 75 minutes, during which time Daniel and Eloise are unseen, but Eloise eventually dies. It’s highly probable that Daniel had Eloise running the maze several times during those 75 minutes before she finally past on. While it is a paradox, it’s not entirely unexplained by Novikov’s theory. Had Desmond not shown up to tell Daniel the setting for his machine, Daniel most likely would have discovered the settings some other way. The universe would have course corrected.
Desmond rushes out of Daniel’s office on his way to find Penny. He faints, and we can now be certain that present Desmond is in some sort of time limbo. It is past Desmond that is bouncing from past to present and back. While in one time, his body in the other time is rendered unconscious. Desmond wakes in the past where he passed out and seeks out Charles Widmore hoping to find Penny’s whereabouts. Desmond gets Penny’s address from Charles.
Desmond visits Penny, saying, “I made a huge mistake. I should never have broken up with you. I know that now… It’s too late to change things.” “I know I’ve ruined things. I know you think things are over between us, but they’re not. If there’s any part of you that still believes in us… just…” “I won’t call for eight years. December the 24th, 2004… Christmas Eve.” Penny gives him a number.
Desmond returns to the present and gives Sayid the number which he enters into the phone. After many rings Penny does answer. “Desmond?!?” “I’ve been looking for you for the past three years. I know about the island. I’ll find you, Dez… no matter what.”
Key characters
| Short Name | Full Name | Episodes | Theories |
|---|---|---|---|
| Desmond | Desmond David Hume | 2.23, 3.17, 4.5 | 899 |
| Mrs. Hawking | Mrs. Hawking | 51 |
Key episodes
| # | Title | Aired | Central character | Theories |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.21 | Greatest Hits | 5-16-2007 | Charlie | 174 |
| 3.17 | Catch 22 | 4-18-2007 | Desmond | 126 |
| 3.8 | Flashes Before Your Eyes | 2-14-2007 | Penny | 243 |
| 2.23 | Live Together, Die Alone | 5-24-2006 | Desmond | 344 |
| 2.1 | Man of Science, Man of Faith | 9-21-2005 | Shannon | 207 |
+1 for the title alone. Brilliant!
Agreed: no time travel, no parallel universes, time is time. Furthermore, “I am not convinced that Desmond hasn’t always had the ability to see events in a non-linear fashion,” makes perfect sense, (as much as Lost makes sense.) Frankly, the less Lost relies on “science fiction” the more intriguing it is for me.
Excellent Work Billy +1. I agree with probably 95%. I don’t think Des has always had the ability but you never know.
Lojozz, I’m only speculating on when Desmond’s ability came about, hence the term The Rationality Theorem. I’m justifying a theory with perceptions of truth that may not be fact. What seems logical to me, may not be logical to you or the characters in the show. I only threw it in at the end because while I was rewatching the Desmond scenes online, I came to realize that much of his “past” seemed suspiciously relavent to his abilities. I’m simply not convinced that all of Desmonds “normal” flashbacks are “normal.” I won’t be disappointed if they are, because it was fun for me to revisit the scenes he was in. Desmond is still my favorite character and his episodes are my favorites.
As for the rest of the crap I wrote, I hope I don’t offend the more scientific types out there with my simplicity. My understanding of the science is slightly only greater than I present here, but I wanted to keep it as simple as possible. I hope my simplicity hasn’t resulted in blatant misuse of terms or inadvertant misunderstandings of science. :)
Billy, I agree that the flashback scenes involving Des are suspicious and could evidence that he is ‘travelling’ but IMO that could still be from a point after the implosion.
That was absolutely brilliant! +1
Btw I have read on other people’s theories and comments about enhanced episodes and extended episodes (you also mentioned it above) where are they avaiable?!?!?!? I’ve got all the dvds of Lost, and there is no mention of extended episodes - unless you mean the deleted scenes…
Awesome - this must have taken you ages!
I think the writers ensure that if someone in the past learns something from the future, then they must quickly forget it again to prevent any paradox. That’s why Des specifically didn’t write Penny’s number down. Future Des has it but past Des must then forget. Similarly, Eloise must run the maze, forget how to, learn it again from Dan, paradox averted. +1
Am not much of atheoriest , am more of areader of other people theories.. You Mr.BillyGoat , awell presenter .. you do present things in avery interesting way , alot of people in this site are good theoriest yet they have avery bad and arrogant attitude , But i dont think you’re ..
Anyway an advice from me , you may take it or leave it , the shorter your theory is , the more attractive it’s , If you have different thoughts put them into different theories, not in one even if the subject is related .. Keep it up and good luck +1
Goat, that was an amazingly beautiful theory.
I totally agree with LostViking. Your theory looked very intriguing until I saw how long it is. I scrolled down forever and ever and finally got to the comments so I could see what others have to say about it and I really really wanna read it but it is soooo looooooong. I am way too ADD for that. I am going to have to read it a section at a time and it will probably take me a couple of days. I think it would be better if it were broken up more and not so wordy. I can tell that it is presented excellently and that you are a great theorist. sigh maybe I will read it and comment again in a couple of days. Hehe.
I’am dazzled, let me have it sink in, for your intensive and interesting researchwork a +1!!
eteo
Thanks for the thorough analysis. Maybe this will put a stop to all the mindless time-travel theories and speculations on people’s constants. +1
absolutely brilliant—and long
LostViking and Appolobar,
I understand your points and consider them truthful should I want to reach the maximum amount of people. However, it would be difficult to shorten this without it loosing its meaning or weakening the evidence. And it would be difficult to break it up into seperate theories because each section is codependent of the other.
Truthful or not, I feel the opposite about theories most times. I’m not actually interested in reaching the masses. If I can reach a few intelligent people and they can pass my ideas along in a shorter form, then fine. I may be preaching to the choir, but I’m one of those rational, logical fact seekers who needs rational, logical explanations, even if they are para-normal or sci-fi inspired, which are very rarely presented in the short, unreadable texts posted on this site.
In the short time I’ve been visiting this site, I’ve seen roughly three dozen “theories” presented. Most aren’t theories at all but people pointing out “facts” that have already been noted on DarkUFO, Lostpedia or other well known fan sites. Of the remainder that are theoretical, most lack evidence to support them and some are downright ridiculous. There are a couple, however, that hold water and should be considered serious until proven otherwise. Hey, I still read them all. It’s fun. But watching them go from 0 to +6 in less than an hour before they’re finally debunked is frustrating.
In fact, it appears that the actual theory part or my post, which was meant to be a secondary point compared to the overall message of the post, has been misunderstood or thought to be weak “because” I made it short. So now I have to add a couple more paragraphs to it so it makes more sense. :)
How am I supposed to get to sleep tonight?
You have guaranteed I am going to be lying there, eyes wide open, mulling this over and over and over!
I want to mention the self-consistency principle as I have ‘co-incidentally’ just read about this in Paul Davies great book ‘How to build a time machine’, but my mind is still reeling from this great post and I am unable to!
one thing though, you know this argument about whether such and such is too complicated for the viewers etc, well I suppose one could put the same argument for ‘back to the future’, one example being the ‘flux’ capacitor, when we all first saw that, we just accepted it did what it did,and the very nature of what Doc had invented, incorporated gravity, electromagnetism, wormholes, all the physics stuff associated with the concept of time-travel, rightly or wrongly, but we all accepted it.
Slight anachronism here, but if the internet existed then as it does now with sites discussing the Doc & Marty’s exploits, I can only imagine there would be a wealth of posts of experts and non-experts arguing over the finer details and feasibilities of it all, the actual physics, the paradoxes and the course-changing, but we still accepted it through the whole trilogy and enjoyed ourselves into the bargain.
LOST certainly has more introspection than back to the future ever did, but perhaps shares the concepts of ‘technology which is ahead of the viewers (us) times’ cerberus perhaps being, so far at least, a good example of this.
I think the real reason we can not determine exactly what Cerberus is yet, is because we don’t know the forum on which the technology/knowlegde is being manifested, reminding me of two of Arthur C. Clarke’s famous statements:
“The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible. ”
“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. ”
So could the wirters have that kind of thinking going on?
+1 for a great post.
Haha, I understand what you mean. I know it needs to be this long and as long as you arent concerned with the masses - you are golden. I still havent read it. I am at work and (even though I do a lot of reading and commenting on here) dont have the time to read it all in one sitting. Hehe. Sounds like it will be an interesting read tonight. I love your attitude about the site! I agree with you, but - like you said - it is stil fun to read and comment on the posts on here, even though a lot of them (mine included) arent legitimate or even serious theories.
one more interesting thing I found was that the narrator in Dean Koontz’s novel ‘The Taking says that the reverse may also be true: “in an age when faith in science is ascendant, supernatural phenomena may be mistaken for advanced technology.”
solarchap,
I someone else mentioned “How To Build A Time Machine” recenlty, but I didn’t recall mention of Noviki’s theory. It would be interesting if someone could combine all those theories into an even more plausible basis of “technology and the universe” as it applies to LOST.
I agree that had we had the internet in 1985, there would be just as many websites dedicated to Back to the Future as there are to LOST now. Many of the debates that revolve around Back to the Future still exist today - particularly those involving paradoxes. One main difference is that the “Flux Capacitor” was a MacGuffin - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacGuffin used to advance the story but never explained.
I also agree that supernatural and paranormal phenomena may be scientifically explained over time, or at a minimum, science and spirituality will find some common ground in the future.
Edited the original post to include a more detailed explanation of the theory and seperate the evidence from the case and noted the edits in the post.
Cheers BillyG,
I just checked the book, and he doesn’t reference Noviki, not sure why, but his main point being that causal loops can be self-consistent with no paradox, one example he quotes is of a rich man whose vast wealth derives from a mysterious benefactor who befriended his great-granny 100 years ago.
The rich man finances a time-machine project and uses the machine to go back to find out about the benefactor. (I’m sure you can see where this is leading!) He takes with him a newspaper to give to his young granny to prove his time-travelling credentials. She scans the paper, notes stock prices and with the help of her foreknowledge, makes shrewd investments.
These investments of course ARE the source of his wealth, and the rich man is of course the ‘mysterious’ benefactor himself. The author describes that there is no paradox because the causal loop is self-consistent and he says that paradoxes loom only when we combine causal loops with ‘unfettered free-will’.
That in itself has the makings of a huge theory but too huge for me!
Funny enough he then goes on to talk about guns jamming to prevent paradoxes! Anyway, it’s all conjecture, but very interesting conjecture!
I am reading ‘The third policeman’ (another book from LOST!) and it is full of strangeness to do with time, but no paradoxes (so far).
Superb. Worth reading. Really excellent look at Lost.
To corroborate your theory, what if Desmond didn’t actually see Charlie dying in the future but he saw a flashforward of himself seeing a possible future scenario… Does that make sense?
There is an episode of Angel (sorry Lost fans) where Cordelia sees a vision of herself in the future talking about her love for Angel and it gives her the confidence to arrange a meeting to tell Angel how she feels. However what she has actually seen is only one side of a conversation she has which leads her to become a higher being.
Maybe this is something similar?
+1 and I wish I could give you another +1 for the title. Melikes.
Its called “Novikov’s self-consistency principle” not “Noviki’s”
But I too saw this connection. My theory on this can be found here:
http://lost-theories.com/theories/2008/apr/01/novikov-self-consistency-princ/
Now that those pesky edits are done, I can respond to some specific comments:
thewhiz83 - Thanks, I’m glad someone understood the reference!
Lojozz - I wasn’t specific about the theory in the post because I brought it up as an afterthought. I had considered your points prior to writing but didn’t want to confuse the issue. I’ve edited the post to include a more detailed explanation of the theory aspect and paraphrased your comments.
Nav - An enhanced episode is an episode that includes a text bar at the bottom which references things relevant to that episode. Sometimes they refer to production facts about the actors, sets, locations or props, while others refer to mythology, books, quotes, scientific formulas, etc. They range from absurd and obvious to in-depth and informational, often mentioning things that fans didn’t notice the first time around.
Only Season 4 episodes are enhanced so far and are shown the following week immediately prior to the new episodes here in the States. They are also available at here: http://dynamic.abc.go.com/streaming/landing and can be streamed over a high speed internet connection. Most are properly labeled as “Enhanced”. You’ll be differentiate them after the video starts when you notice a black and green bar along the bottom.
MrAlpert - It took a couple of hours to write out the basic ideas. Then it took a couple of hours to flesh them out and find and quote all the sources. Then it took a few hours to locate, watch and transcribe the Desmond scenes.
JacksEyes - Past Desmond didn’t write the number down because he new it wouldn’t come with him to the present. He had to commit it to memory. Once the call was made, we may assume that Past Desmond and Present Desmond are returned to their appropriate timelines because they’ve found and contacted their “constant.” However, I theorize that Past Desmond will retain the memories of his time in the present. Present Desmond, however, has no recollection of the events that occured because when Past Desmond relinquished his body, he was rendered unconscious.
LostViking and Appolobar - Hopefully, you’ll find that it’s a quick and easy read. At a minimum, I’ve seperated it into topics which, although codependent of one another, are easy to read in chunks.
DCLostie - Hopefully.
solarchap - The casual loop you presented here is a reverse example of the grandfather paradox. I don’t think it contradicts my post - Minor paradoxes are acceptable in a flexible space/time continuum where major events will occur independently. I’m not sure that “unfettered free will” has much to do with anything in a flexible universe where infinite amounts of changes can occur between point A and point B, and still result in point C. That becomes more of a philisophical debate between Free will vs. Predetermination and could be a topic all on its own. None-the-less, you’ve brought up some interesting points.
segwaypirate -
I stand corrected. I’m not sure why I consistently mispelled it… I will edit the spelling.
And I did reference your theory in the credits. It seems like you feel I’ve ripped you off in some way. I’ll move it to the beginning of the post so it’s more obvious.
Long and boring -1
Good thoughts. Love the title. Funny, i just finished watching Dr.Strangelove. +1
Nicely done. It’s been a long time since there has been a quality in-depth theory on here.
Great read. I don’t mind the length.
The only thing missing is commentary on what the Dharma Initiative is doing with “all those precious bodily fluids.”
+1
even though this theory is long - it has been put together very well and only a detailed theory could explain time on the island - i don’t understand why people have given it a -1
drive by minuses suck. Nice to see Q and MrAlpert out this evening.
The negatives are coming from folks, like myself, who feel this theory quilt has been stitched from appropriated thread.
I would have to say this is one of the better theories I’ve ever read on this site…thanks for taking the time to present the information in such a concise manner.
+1.
Buh-bye time travel, I’m happy to see you go :P
blondegop__,
Thank you for the -1. I found your comment “long and boring” very insightful and well thought out. I’ll keep it in mind the next time I post a theory that’s actually backed up by facts, quotes and reputable sources. I should have put in some pictures for you to look at while you thought up that brilliant criticism.
As for me “stitching” this post together, as you so eloquently put it, I was pretty sure I made that obvious in the beginning. I gave credit to segwaypirate’s Novikov theory, which was about Michael, not Desmond. I credited every source I am aware of to back up my words and never took credit for those sources. And at the end, I even formed a theory based on the evidence I provided. I thought my intent was clear and my meaning concise, backed up with facts, quotes and examples to further convince the reader. If you simply disagreed with me, then fine. Tell me where I’m wrong.
I honestly don’t care about the -1’s. But 3/4’s of the theories on this site are “appropriated” from other sources. To suggest that anything is very original is to suggest that you’ve never heard of Lostpedia, DarkUFO, the fuselage forums and ABC’s own LOST forums. Everyone’s got a theory and chances are, someone already came up with it.
I’m sorry you didn’t like it, but if one person was informed or inspired to rethink the “time travel” theory they were about to post, then I did my job. Thank you and good night.
Science Fiction is Science Fiction……..
Although I agree with your premise that we are witnessing “mind travel” and not “time travel” on Lost. What difference does it make? Mind travel, or the ability to experience time, “past, present and future - simultaneously” is still science fiction. So whether Desmond is traveling in his mind or otherwise, it’s still science fiction. Both methods of travel will create paradoxes that can not be resolved.
Are you suggesting that Desmond’s “mind travel” somehow makes the story more believable? Are we suppose to say to ourselves, Oh, yes, “mind travel” now that makes sense.
BillyGOat,(sorry I can’t get the name with lines in between to show up as you do?) please disregard the comment by Blondegop it was written by a troll who uses real L-T members names(with a twist) to make divisive comments and to make the real member feel as helpless and impotent as he himself is.
alice1,
Good point, but I think I didn’t make myself clear if that’s how you feel. I’m suggesting that because there is no time travel on the show that no technology, wormhole or other means of time travel exist. This is of great importance because it means no other major character, save Desmond, is able to experience time outside of the present.
Surely, both methods would create paradoxes, but in Desmond’s case, like that of Bruce Willis’ character in 12 Monkeys, nothing he does can, or will, effect the major events of space/time. In fact, to be more specific, what I’m proposing is that the things he does actually enforce the events of space/time because he is able to experience a non-linear past, present and future simultaneously.
One example might be that Desmond didn’t always attempt to buy the ring and was then “course corrected” by Mrs. Hawking. Nothing she says contradicts the fact that she is there saying it and was always there saying it. It simply implies that present Desmond doesn’t remember her saying it. She says you don’t buy the ring… And he doesn’t. She says he doesn’t marry Penny… And he doesn’t. Why do we assume that in some “other” previously unaffected timeline that she didn’t always say those things? Because Desmond would remember them?
Clearly Desmond’s sense of linear time is severely puzzling to even him at this point. His 3 years on the island (2 of which were entirely in the station), long term exposure to electromagnetic build-ups, short term exposure to a massive electromagnetic burst at ground zero, long term chronic depression, and failed attempt to leave the island might have something to do with his memory issues, no?
Furthermore, I do believe that having only one major character who is
1) inherently omnipresent in their their own space/time
2) predestined to make the same choices over and over at great sacrifice to his happiness
3) the axis around which all other characters lives have come to a head
4) and the possible savior of the entire world and/or universe as we know it
is more believable, tragic and poetic than having some mystery device or wormhole that’s able to transport people through time
1) at any moment they choose
2) for any reason they see fit
3) to change any event they see fit
4) and without unpredictable consequence.
I find the former to be grounded in philosophy and theology while the latter is grounded in fantasy and science fiction. This appears to be where we disagree.
Thanks for the criticism. You made me think about things even more. :).
I’ve been deliberately skipping over this theory due to the length, waiting until I had some time and peace to read it properly. This morning, I have done just that.
Excellently written. Though, as you state, the exercise is ultimately to debunk, it’s done thoroughly and sentiently. For me, you didn’t need to add a theory to justify its presence on the site. It’s worth a +1 without the theory.
Interesting theory none-the-less. I do struggle to give writers credit at envisaging Desmond’s mind travelling and course correction and Constant elements way back in the first episode of Season 2, though! (I’m a cynic, in that respect.) But it’s nice, even if never intended, how it can fit surprisingly deftly.
Last point: Desmond didn’t end up in prison because he left the army base during The Constant. He had been granted leave at that point. I only mention it because the story of how he does end up in prison is, for me, an interesting revelation still pending.
Good stuff, Billy. Through your comments and posts you’re a welcome addition to L-T.
Some links to related theories of my own that you might find fun to read, as they deal, respectively, with Desmond and Paradox.
http://lost-theories.com/theories/2007/dec/18/idiot-desmond-rant/
http://lost-theories.com/theories/2008/mar/04/rat-problem/
AngeloComet,
Thanks. I have the same hopes you do that the reason he gets imprisoned will be a pivotal point in the story and not so easily explained as I have done. I’ll check out your links a.s.a.p.
I wrote a very long rebuttals to your theory, but I decided that it was too important to leave as just a comment, likely only to be read by one person. So instead I’ll post it as a theory and link you: http://www.lost-theories.com/theories/2008/apr/05/rumor-mill-and-why-time-travel/
ravenontheleft,
Read it and commented. +1 to yours.
Good day.
I loved this! Excellent! +1
Billy….I am really enjoying your post & comments…it is nice to have you around.
Billy, +1 for an outstanding, well written and well thought theory! You’re a welcome addition to the LT family.