It’s all about the characters
+3 3 Votes
Rate it:
By ProfOzone
- It’s all about the characters
- Created: Apr 30, 2007
- Last updated: Aug 14, 2008
- After episode: 3.15: Left Behind
- Status: Current
- Flag this theory:
This theory is based on What we KNOW about Adam and Eve. by LOSTCONNECTION. You may wish to read it before continuing.
Sometimes all of us fans are so busy feeling starved and looking for crumbs that we don’t notice that five of the seven courses we’ve been promised have already been served.
— ProfOzone
After reading LostConnection’s exceptional post re: Adam and Eve, I’ve been inspired to make explicit a point that LC’s post demonstrates in practice… that is, LOST is all about the people. I think this is a point that many fans of the show often forget.
Case in point:
When Ben told John about the “magic box”, theories flew all over the place in regard to what this box may or may not be. It seemed apparent that the writers had suddenly revealed some very significant clue that heretofore had been hidden from the eager viewing audience.
But had the fans all forgotten that John first introduced the idea that the island gives folks what they want way back in season 1? In only the seventh episode of the entire series? (It was in reference to Charlie getting his guitar back.) OK, sure, John is… well… John. For him to spout what might sound like metaphysical nonsense right after he arrives on the island isn’t nearly as impressive as Ben telling us something after living there his entire life. BUT… it seems to me that if folks remembered what John told Charlie, they’d also realize that Ben wasn’t giving John information that was new to John! That it was important that Ben said, “How can I explain this in a way you’ll understand…” That the most important thing about what Ben said wasn’t in what new information it was supposedly introducing. Rather, the most important thing about what Ben revealed to John is it confirmed for John everything he already believed about the island.
To see the moment between Ben and John this way, though, one has to be able to see the forest for all the trees. Sometimes all of us fans are so busy feeling starved and looking for crumbs that we don’t notice that five of the seven courses we’ve been promised have already been served.
For the writers, I’ll bet this is supremely frustrating. To them, the odd things that happen on the island are just that. Odd things. Requiring no explanation beyond that. If they’d written a story about a haunted house, would they have to explain everything that happened in it? No. The fact that it’s haunted would be explanation enough, and then they could go about getting their audience engaged with their characters. But with LOST the mystique of the place seems to be interfering somewhat with people connecting with the characters in the show.
Since the show isn’t really about explaining all of the odd occurrences, delving into Eastern mysticism and/or quantum physics, all of the people looking for those kinds of answers get impatient. They stop watching or suggest that the writers are just making it up as they go along. Thankfully, some people go back to seasons 1 and 2 and pick up on themes that they missed before and realize, “Gee, I guess the writers DID know what they were doing, I just wasn’t paying close enough attention!” But there are a significant number of people who, no matter what, still insist if the show isn’t going the direction they wanted it to then it isn’t going anywhere at all.
Perhaps all of what I’m saying seems odd coming from a person who has posted so many theories here attempting to uncover the backdrop against which the characters are cast. But for all of my blather my point has been, ironically, that for the writers the backdrop is probably not complicated. For the average viewer, in fact, knowing that the island has “paranormal properties” is probably enough. Sure, the writers are probably influenced by all kinds of theories in science, metaphysics, religion, and psychology. But these things are not the meat, if you will, of the show. They just give the island the “weird properties” it needs for them to animate and motivate their characters within the overall plot.
None of this is to say that theorizing about magnets and timelines and such isn’t fun or useful. But I think one will miss the overall point of the show if such ideas become the lens through which the show is watched. The centerpiece of any comprehensive theory ought to be, I think, the characters and who they are and where they’re going. I think LostConnection’s post re: Adam and Eve is an excellent example of how this can be done.
Key characters
| Short Name | Full Name | Episodes | Theories |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ben | Benjamin Linus | 3.20, 4.9, & 3” href=”/episodes/theres-no-place-home-parts-2-3/”>4.13 | 1714 |
| John | John Locke | 3.3, 2.17, 1.4, 1.19, 3.13, 3.19, 4.11, & 3” href=”/episodes/theres-no-place-home-parts-2-3/”>4.13 | 1229 |
Great post. Maybe the island (the part we don’t know about) has a shorter explanation than some theories state. And, i guess, if people think more about the mistery than the characters and this is unwanted it’s a flaw in the show, isn’t it? Maybe that’s what makes the show really special. From on side the people who want to know the mistery, on the other side people want to know the character’s life, or people who want it all, everybody can find the aspect of the show they like the most (of course both things could be related, but that’s not the point). Because that’s were the show has it’s magnetic energy, it gives people what they want ;)
:-) Good point, leo.
Leo—the magnetic energy of the show—great point.
And excellent post ProfO. I love theorizing myself, but I often think when I’m reading theory posts that its got to be something that comes across in the action and the character development. I think what’s great about Lost is that the writers are throwing a lot of stuff in for us theory addicts, but it isn’t detached from the characters or the story. So for someone like me, it just doubles the pleasure of watching the show.
You guys are always around here!! :D
We’re bots.
Kinda like life, eh?…..getting caught up in what the meaning is and how its going to end instead of enjoying the characters in it. When really, the characters is what its all about.
ProfOzone - I am glad you like my work.
Good points, jazprof and shell.
LC: I’m glad you shared it!
Love this post and completely agree its about the enjoyment, and we have had loads of answers…….I personally love the suspense and the questions how many other shows do you put so much thought and attention into. Genius.
most television writers would hope this to be true but the problem with lost is that many people find that they don’t care about the characters at all. that’s why there is so much criticsm about the flashbacks.
I agree however that the explanation for the mysterys will probably be character centric (ie. not really to much about the hanso foundation or other behind the scenes stuff)
What a fantastic perspective. While we are all posting our theories and speculations, stepping back from all the hoopla and really seeing the show for its true intrinsic value is difficult to do. Even if the show ended right now I know that this show has created something unique in network TV. Whether if be the characters, plots, mysteries, no show has ever gotten the avid viewers so involved like this show has.
Well said!
Yes, very well said indeed. I especially loved the metaphor of us starving fans not appreciating the courses laid before us. I love to analyze the show and its characters and read theories, but I agree that it’s not all about the science and the mystery, it’s about the people like Jack and Kate and Sawyer and how they cope with things and react in certain situations. Most people who love Lost are also fans of awesomely great character development. At least that’s what I’ve come across in all of my friends and family that watch the show.